Loading...
 

Perpetual Motion

Perpetual Motion


posted to Home Shop Machinist, 04/15/09


"Keely did not seek to invent, nor did he claim to have invented, perpetual motion." The Snell Manuscript

"In the conception of any machinery heretofore, the medium for inducing a neutral center has never been found. If it had, the difficulties of perpetual motion seekers would have ended and this problem would have become an established fact, requiring only an introductory impulse to cause it to run for centuries. I did not seek to attain perpetual motion, but a circuit is formed that actually has a neutral center, which is in a condition to be vivified by my vibratory ether, and while under operation by said substance is really a machine that is virtually independent of the mass (or globe) and it is the wonderful velocity of the vibratory circuit which makes it so. Still, with all its perfection, it requires to be fed with the vibratory ether to make it an independent motor." [Keely, THE NEUTRAL CENTER]

"Mr. Keely, at that time, wrote of those who called him a perpetual motion seeker:- "I console myself by thinking that if they were not ignorant of the grand truths which I am devoting my life to develop into a system, they could never bring forward such an absurd charge. Perpetual motion is against nature, and it is only by following nature's laws that I can ever hope to reach the goal I am aiming to reach." [Helpers on the Road and Hinderers]


The concept of so-called perpetual motion has been claimed to have been investigated by conventional engineering. Classical thermodynamics deals with closed systems. Legitimate and working overunity devices are open systems and hence outside the classical definition of closed systems and therefore any association with perpetual motion. See Bearden's book Energy from the Vacuum for a more precise discussion of open and closed thermodynamic systems as also his thorough discussion of actual perpetual motion here. See also Open System and Closed System and Second Law of Thermodynamics for a clear presentation on known perpetual motion systems.



Conventional science recognizes three types of so-called Perpetual Motion:

  • Perpetual Motion of the First Kind
(PHYS) A mechanism which, when set in motion, continues to do useful work without an input of energy, or which produces more energy than is absorbed in its operation; it violates the principle of conservation of energy.

  • Perpetual Motion of the Second Kind
(PHS) A device that extracts heat from a source and then converts this heat completely into other forms of energy; it violates the second law of thermodynamics.

  • Perpetual Motion of the Third Kind
(PHS) A device which has a component that can continue moving forever; an example is a superconductor. (McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Science & Technology)

A careful review of the above premises indicates
1) in the first it is a CLOSED SYSTEM such as a mechanical device isolating gravity and scalar forces cannot run continuously;
2) complete conversion of one form of energy into another is not likely given our current state of technology; and
3) terms have not been defined. For example what does "forever" mean? Could six to fourteen billion years be considered "forever" as in the earth spinning continuously, which it has done? Besides all that, heat is an EFFECT and not a CAUSE. What conventional engineering could do, if they weren't so anal-retentive, is to investigate such cases of CONTINUOUS motion within an OPEN system and find out why and how they are what they are and do what they do.

Of course, it is far easier to label things not understood as fraud or scam and wave them off than to admit an incomplete knowledge base; i.e., the presumption is We know everything there is to know about everything there is so stop already with the unanswerable and embarassing questions.

Thousands of engineers have checked out this particular device and not a single one can say why and how it works - even though it has been working for the past 30 or so years. Obviously they are so fanatical with their beliefs they cannot see with new eyes. I don't know why it does what it does and many of those who've actually looked at it and are honest and have integrity admit they don't know either. Of course, the dogmatic pontificators already know it is a fraud so why waste their so incredibly valuable time and 'expertise' to actually investigate it?

Testatika

We do know this device is an OPEN system therefore Perpetual Motion of the First Kind does not apply. Apparently there is ample outside energy (scalar) coming into the system to power it - or if you have a better idea??? This device does not convert heat so Perpetual Motion of the Second Kind does not apply. Perpetual Motion of the Third Kind does not apply because none of its components can move forever (whatever that means) because being mechanical they would wear out and cease to move. Obviously what components do move are moved by an outside force (scalar) made use of by its design and mechanisms. These being the case this device is NOT a perpetual motion machine in any sense of that phrase as defined by conventional and accepted engineering and yet it moves continuously.

But as Galileo said "Yet it does move!"




BC Perpetual Motion







See Also

Cayce Perpetual Motion Machines
Celestial Sympathetic Radiation
Closed System
Continuous Motion
Dynaspheric Force
Free Energy
Heaviside Component
Heaviside energy flow component
Introductory Impulse
Keelys Accomplishments
Laws of Thermodynamics
Life
Newton Laws of Motion
Open System
Overunity
Power vs Energy
Scalar
Scalar Potential
Second Law of Thermodynamics
System
Universal Heart Beat
Wave Field
Page last modified on Tuesday 14 of March, 2017 04:53:59 MDT

Search For a Wiki Page

Last-Visited Pages